{"id":3393,"date":"2020-04-30T17:21:36","date_gmt":"2020-04-30T21:21:36","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ec2-18-221-120-76.us-east-2.compute.amazonaws.com\/?page_id=3393"},"modified":"2020-04-30T17:21:36","modified_gmt":"2020-04-30T21:21:36","slug":"neither-do-i-condemn-you","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/societies.newchurch.org\/phoenix\/from-the-pastors\/neither-do-i-condemn-you\/","title":{"rendered":"“Neither Do I Condemn You”"},"content":{"rendered":"

It\u2019s often said that God is love\u2014and all too often is this idea misunderstood. Sometimes it\u2019s taken to mean that God is nothing but an amorphous feeling. Other times people claim that God is love, yet they also speak of Him as though He\u2019s capable of turning away from His people or growing cold towards them. But love does not do those things. The Lord eternally and unyieldingly loves every single human being\u2014even as He teaches us, very clearly, what we should and shouldn\u2019t do. Simple as this idea is, it can be hard to grasp.<\/p>\n

The title of this article comes from the story of the woman caught in adultery (John 8:2-11), one of the best-known stories in the Gospel. In this story the scribes and Pharisees bring to the Lord a woman \u201ccaught in adultery, in the very act\u201d (v. 4). And they inform Him, \u201cNow Moses, in the law, commanded us that such should be stoned. But what do You say?\u201d (v. 5). The whole situation is obviously supposed to be a trap. The Pharisees clearly imagined that the Lord would have no choice but to either reject the law of Moses\u2014and thereby throw away His credibility\u2014or state that the stern sentence should be upheld, thereby making Himself seem less than compassionate in the eyes of the public.<\/p>\n

The setup was a mockery of justice to begin with. The Pharisees did indeed know the law\u2014but why were they dragging this woman into the street to be judged in public? Where was the man with whom she had committed adultery? The Lord\u2019s first act was to communicate that He wanted nothing to do with any of it. He \u201cstooped down and wrote on the ground with His finger, as though He did not hear\u201d (v. 6). But when they pressed Him, He turned the situation around by revealing the hypocrisy of the Pharisees: famously, He told them, \u201cHe who is without sin among you, let him throw a stone at her first\u201d (v. 7).<\/p>\n

All this is powerful, but what\u2019s perhaps the most powerful part of the story occurs right at the very end. When the crowd was gone and the Lord was alone with this woman, He asked her if anyone had condemned her. When she said no, He told her, \u201cNeither do I condemn you; go and sin no more\u201d (v. 11).<\/p>\n

These words sum up the Lord\u2019s entire attitude towards our sins. He does not condemn us. He never condemns us. He has absolutely no interest in condemnation; it doesn\u2019t serve His purpose. He loves us. He wants to make us happy and bring us to heaven. How would condemning us serve these purposes? It\u2019s antithetical to His attitude towards us. The Heavenly Doctrines of the New Church make this point very clearly:<\/p>\n

\n

The Lord is as far from cursing or being angry with anyone as the sky is from the earth. Who can believe that the Lord, who is all-knowing and all-powerful, who with wisdom rules the universe, and so who is infinitely superior to all weaknesses, could be angry with such pitiful dust, that is, with human beings? (Arcana Coelestia<\/em> \u00a71093)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Now, being described as \u201cpitiful dust\u201d isn\u2019t exactly comforting. When we describe something as \u201cpitiful,\u201d usually what we mean by that is that it\u2019s worthy of our contempt. But the whole point of this article is that the Lord is incapable of contempt. We may read contempt into the idea of pity, but it doesn\u2019t have to be there. In this passage, \u201cpitiful\u201d simply means worthy of pity. Someone in a \u201cpitiful\u201d state is someone who needs help. And\u2014at least in comparison with God\u2014all of us desperately need help. How could He not look at us with pity, or with compassion?<\/p>\n

And as for us being \u201cdust\u201d\u2014again, we can read a note of contempt into this statement, but it doesn\u2019t have to be there. To say that we\u2019re like dust in regard to the Lord simply means that compared to Him we\u2019re powerless, and really small. Another way to put it is that God is so much bigger than we tend to realize. If we were a speck of dust on the ground, He, by comparison, would be bigger than creation itself.<\/p>\n

Imagine an adult being angry with a child. Not just scolding or disciplining a child, but actually being angry with that child\u2014rejecting them, treating them with coldness, looking for vindication. We would say that that adult was out of line. The emotional and mental \u201csmallness\u201d of the child, in comparison with the adult, makes that sort of anger especially inappropriate. In comparison with God, we are that child\u2014and in fact we\u2019re so much smaller. We\u2019re a piece of dust on the ground, and He\u2019s greater than the whole starry sky. How could He be angry with us? How could He ever see us as anything but wayward children who need His help\u2014children who need His compassion?<\/p>\n

All of these ideas are held within the Lord\u2019s statement that He does not condemn us. Compassion is the very foundation of His relationship with us. He is incapable of coming to us with a critical heart, incapable of turning up His nose at us, incapable of turning away His face with disapproval. And this is true even when we sin. The Lord said that He would not condemn a woman who had been caught in the very act of adultery\u2014and adultery is no small sin. He knows all too well how much pain adultery causes.<\/p>\n

He does not want that pain. He has compassion on us even when we make destructive choices, but He also sees (much more clearly than we do) just how much hurt those choices cause. He will not condemn us, but we\u2019re capable of condemning ourselves. And that is not what He wants. So He didn\u2019t only tell this woman caught in adultery that He didn\u2019t condemn her; He also told her, \u201cGo and sin no more.\u201d He didn\u2019t flinch away from calling her sin a sin. That wouldn\u2019t have helped her make a better choice\u2014and so it would not have been loving. He is infinitely wise, and that means He knows what will make us happy and what will not. Being love itself, He\u2019s not content to simply let us make unhappy choices. He\u2019ll allow us to walk an unhappy path if we insist on it. But, because He is love itself, He works eternally and unyieldingly to show us a better way.<\/p>\n

To put it very simply: His goal is to save us. His goal is to save us from our sins and lead us to the greatest joy that we can possibly receive. Never\u2014not for the smallest instant\u2014does this cease to be His goal. And anger is incompatible with this goal. To abandon us would be incompatible with this goal. Condemnation is incompatible with this goal. Not for the smallest instant does He waver from this purpose.<\/p>\n

\n

[The Lord is] Love itself, to which no other attributes are appropriate than those of pure Love and so of pure Mercy towards the whole human race, that Mercy being such that it wills to save all people, to make them eternally happy, and to impart to them all that is its Own\u2014thus out of pure Mercy and by the mighty power of love to draw towards heaven, that is, towards Itself, all who are willing to follow. (Arcana Coelestia<\/em> \u00a71735)<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n

\u2014Rev. Jared Buss, May 2020<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Rev. Jared Buss writes about the Lord’s goals, and how they show up in the story of the woman caught in adultery.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":3943,"parent":17,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3393","page","type-page","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","blog-style1"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/societies.newchurch.org\/phoenix\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3393","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/societies.newchurch.org\/phoenix\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/societies.newchurch.org\/phoenix\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/societies.newchurch.org\/phoenix\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/societies.newchurch.org\/phoenix\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3393"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/societies.newchurch.org\/phoenix\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/3393\/revisions"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/societies.newchurch.org\/phoenix\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/17"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/societies.newchurch.org\/phoenix\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3943"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/societies.newchurch.org\/phoenix\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3393"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/societies.newchurch.org\/phoenix\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3393"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/societies.newchurch.org\/phoenix\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3393"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}